War of the Pacific

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Jump to: navigation, search


Flag of the Republic of Peru
History of Peru
Timeline
Ancient Peru
Caral
Chavin culture
Wari culture
Inca Empire
Colonial Peru
The Conquerors
Viceroyalty of Peru
Republic of Peru
Independence
Peru-Bolivian Confederacy
War of the Pacific

The War of the Pacific was fought between Chile and the joint forces of Bolivia and Peru, from 1879 to 1884. Chile gained substantial mineral-rich territory in the conflict, leaving Bolivia a land-locked country, annexing the Peruvian province of Tarapacá and the Bolivian province of Litoral.

Contents

Origins

Peru, Bolivia and Chile before the 1879 War
Enlarge
Peru, Bolivia and Chile before the 1879 War

The War of the Pacific grew out of a dispute between Chile and Bolivia over control of a part of the Atacama desert that lies between the 23rd and 26th parallels on the Pacific coast. The territory contained valuable mineral resources which were exploited by Chilean companies and British interests; a tax increase on these quickly escalated into a commercial dispute, diplomatic crisis and war.

Control of natural resources

The dry climate of the area had permitted the accumulation and preservation of huge quantities of high-quality nitrate deposits –guano and saltpeter– over thousands of years. The discovery during the 1840s of their use as fertilizer and as a key ingredient in explosives made the area strategically valuable; Bolivia, Chile and Peru had suddenly found themselves sitting on the largest reserves of a resource that the world needed for economic and military expansion.

Not long after this discovery, world powers were directly or indirectly vying for control of the area's resources. The USA had passed legislation in 1856 enabling its citizens to take posession of islands containing guano. Spain had seized Peruvian territory, but was repulsed by Peru and Chile fighting as allies during the Chincha Islands War. Heavy British capital investment drove development thorough the area, although Peru later nationalized guano exploitation during the 1870s.

In any case, an unresolved border issue would come to the forefront in the next few decades.

Border dispute

Bolivian and Chilean historians disagree on whether the territory of Charcas, originally part of the Viceroyalty of Peru, later of the Viceroyalty of La Plata and ultimately of Bolivia, included access to the sea. Supporting their claims with different documents, Bolivians claim that it did while Chileans disagree. When Simón Bolívar established Bolivia, he claimed access to the sea, although most economic exploitation of the coastal region was being conducted by Chilean companies and British interests, under the aegis of Chile's more robust economy and more stable institutions.

National borders in the region had not been clearly agreed until 1866; the two countries had negotiated a treaty[1] that established the 24th parallel as their boundary, and entitled Bolivia and Chile to share in tax revenue on mineral exports out of the territory between the 23rd and 25th parallels. A second treaty in 1874 superseded this, entitling Bolivia to collect full tax revenue between the 23rd and 24th parallels, but fixed tax rates on Chilean companies for 25 years[2]. Bolivia subsequently became dissatisfied at the arrangement, as Chilean interests backed by British capital quickly expanded and controlled the mining industry, and feared Chilean encroachment on its coastal region.

Crisis and war

In 1878 the Bolivian government of President Hilarión Daza, decreed a tax increase on Chilean companies, over protests by the Chilean government of President Aníbal Pinto that the border treaty did not allow such increase. When the Antofagasta Nitrate & Railway Company refused to pay, the Bolivian government threatened to confiscate its property. Chile responded by sending a warship to the area in December 1878. Bolivia announced the seizure and auction of the company for February 14, 1879. Chile in turn threatened that such action would render the border treaty null and void. On the day of the auction, Chilean troops arrived, disembarked and occupied the port city of Antofagasta.

Now facing a territorial issue, Bolivia declared war on March 1, 1879 and invoked its secret alliance with Peru: the Defensive Treaty of 1873[3]. The Peruvian government was determined to honor its alliance with Bolivia to contain what they perceived as Chile's expansionist ambitions in the region, but was concerned that Allied forces were not in shape to face the Chilean Army; a peaceful resolution was preferred. Peru attempted to mediate by sending a top diplomat to negotiate with the Chilean government. Chile requested neutrality and Peru declined, citing the now public treaty with Bolivia. Chile responded by breaking diplomatic contact and formally declaring war on both Allies on April 5, 1879. Peru thus found itself drawn into the war in spite of not being a party to the original dispute.

Argentina was invited to join the Alliance. Since it had a territorial dispute with Chile regarding the region of Patagonia, and was also wary of Chilean expansion, its entry in the war seemed possible and would have provided an advantage to the Allies. Argentina, however, decided to pursue a peaceful settlement to its own separate dispute and did not join the war.

The War

Bolivia, after several short-lived governments, stood unprepared to face the Chilean Army by itself. From the beginning of the war it became clear that, in a difficult desert war, control of the sea would provide the deciding factor. Bolivia had no navy and Peru faced an economic collapse that left its navy and army without proper training or budget. Most of its warships were old and unable to face battle, leaving only the ironclads Huáscar and Independencia ready. In contrast, Chile had well-prepared armed forces: a modern navy supplemented a well-trained and equipped army.

Naval Campaign

Under the direction of Rear Admiral Juan Williams, the Chilean Navy and its powerful battleships –Almirante Cochrane and Blanco Encalada– started to operate on the Bolivian and Peruvian coast. The port of Iquique was blockaded, while Huanillos, Mollendo, Pica and Pisagua were bombarded and port facilities burned. Rear Admiral Williams hoped that, by disrupting commerce and especially saltpeter exports or weapons imports, the Allies' war effort would be weakened and the Peruvian Navy would be forced into a decisive showdown.

The smaller but effective Peruvian Navy did not oblige. Under the command of Captain Miguel Grau aboard Huáscar, Peru staged a series of blockade runs and harassment raids deep into Chilean waters. The plan was to disrupt Chilean operations, draw the enemy fleet back to the South while avoiding at all costs a fight against superior forces; as a consequence the Chilean invasion would be delayed, the Allies would be free to supply and reinforce its troops along the coast, and weapons would still flow into Peru from the North.

The Battle of Chipana, the first of the war, took place off Huanillos on 12 April 1879, as Peruvian corvettes Unión and Pilcomayo found Chilean corvette Magallanes on its way to Iquique. After a two-hour running artillery duel, Unión suffered engine problems; the pursuit was called off and Magallanes escaped with minor damage.

Naval Battle of Iquique
Enlarge
Naval Battle of Iquique

In the Naval Battle of Iquique of 21 May 1879, Peruvian ships Huáscar and Independencia lifted the blockade of Iquique by Esmeralda and Covadonga, two of Chile's oldest wooden vessels. Huáscar sank Esmeralda, while Covadonga forced the larger Independencia to run aground at Punta Gruesa (some historians consider this a different engagement and call it the Battle of Punta Gruesa).

The Chilean Navy lost a wooden corvette and elevated Captain Arturo Prat of Esmeralda as a martyr to their cause: he led a handful of sailors in boarding the ironclad. The Peruvian Navy lost a powerful ironclad frigate and saw Captain Miguel Grau's renown grow among friend and foe as a result of his actions: he rescued the survivors of Esmeralda after the battle and wrote condolences to the widow of Captain Prat. Significantly, Huáscar remained the only Peruvian vessel capable of holding off the invasion.

For six months, the Huáscar roamed the seas and effectively cut off the Chilean supply lines. In an impressive display of naval mastery, Captain Miguel Grau was able to hold off the entire Chilean Navy, recover captured Peruvian vessels and severely damage many ports used by the Chilean Navy. These actions are known as the "Correrías del Huáscar" (Huáscar's Exploits) and as a result Captain Grau was promoted to the rank of Rear Admiral. A brief listing of these actions include:

  • Damaged ports of Cobija, Tocopilla, Platillos and Mejillones, Huanillos, Punta de Lobo, Chanaral, Huasco, Caldera, Coquimbo & Tatal
  • Sank 16 Chilean vessels
  • Damaged Chilean vessels Blanco Encalada, Abtao, Magallanes, and Matías Cousiño
  • Captured Chilean vessels Emilia, Adelaida Rojas, E. Saucy Jack, Adriana Lucía, Rimac, and Coquimbo
  • Recovered Peruvian vessels Clorinda and Caquetá
  • Destroyed artillery batteries of Antofagasta
  • Destroyed Antofagasta-Valparaiso communications cable

It took the Chilean Navy a full day of sailing with six ships in order to corner the Húascar, and then, nearly two hours of bloody combat with their vessels Blanco Encalada, Covadonga and Cochrane to cause her to founder with 76 artillery hits in the Naval Battle of Angamos on 8 October 1879. The dead included Admiral Grau.

Control of the seas enabled the Chilean Army to invade Peru. Bolivia, unable to recover its province of Antofagasta, participated in the Peruvian defence of Tarapacá. Chile had superiority on land as well, having the advantage of modern artillery and better rifles.

Ground Campaign

Battle of Chorrillos
Enlarge
Battle of Chorrillos

Two weeks after the capture of Huáscar, the Chilean Army started its invasion of Peru. With full control of the sea, an Army of nearly 10,000 soldiers landed and captured the small port of Pisagua, splitting the Peruvian-Bolivian Army in two.

Marching towards the city of Iquique, the first battle of the campaign started. In the Battle of San Francisco, the Chilean Army held off a sudden counterattack, in which both sides suffered several casualties. The Bolivians withdrew, forcing the Peruvian Army to retreat to the city of Tarapacá. Four days later, the Chilean Army captured Iquique, with little resistance.

An expedition composed of 3,600 soldiers and artillery were sent to wipe out the rest of the Peruvian Army. Fewer than 2,000 Peruvian soldiers were there, poorly trained and demoralized by the previous defeat. The Chileans captured a key position and surrounded the city, from which they started their attack. Nevertheless, the Chilean expedition was disbanded in the Battle for Tarapacá: the Peruvians managed to rout the enemy, forcing them to leave behind significant quantities of supplies and ammunition. However, the victory counted for little, because a separate Chilean force left Pisagua and disembarked nearly 12,000 soldiers in Pacocha Bay, destroying any practical hope for reinforcement of the provinces of Tacna and Arica.

Oil Painting by Juan Lepiani which represents the battle of Arica on June 7, 1880
Enlarge
Oil Painting by Juan Lepiani which represents the battle of Arica on June 7, 1880

On June 7, 1880, some 7,000 Chilean forces backed by the Navy successfully attacked a Peruvian garrison in Arica, which was under Colonel Francisco Bolognesi. Chilean forces, directed by Colonel Pedro Lagos, had to run up the Morro de Arica (a steep and tall hill) facing 2000 allied men commanded by Colonel Bolognesi. The assault became known as the Battle of Arica, which became one of the most tragic of the war: Chile had 474 casualties, while almost 1,000 Peruvians lost their lives, including Colonel Bolognesi. Since the Morro de Arica was the last bulwark of defence for the allied troops standing in the city, its occupation by Chile has been of historical importance for both countries. Bolivia decided to withdraw from the war after this battle and previous desert confrontations.

In October 1880, the United States unsuccessfully mediated in the conflict aboard USS Lackawanna at Arica Bay, attempting to end the war with diplomacy. Representatives from the Chile, Peru, and Bolivia met to discuss the territorial disputes, yet both Peru and Bolivia rejected the loss of their territories to Chile and abandoned the conference. By January 1881, the Chilean Army marched towards the Peruvian capital, Lima. After Peruvian defeats in the battles of San Juan and Miraflores, Lima fell in January 1881 to the forces of Chilean General Manuel Baquedano; the southern suburbs of Lima, including the upscale beach area of Chorrillos, were sacked and burned to the ground. The outlying haciendas were burned down by the Chinese coolies who had been brought in for cheap labor. (Chilean historians claim that the Chilean troops entered Lima to prevent looting and destruction after the collapse of authority there; Historical records show that those same Chilean forces were responsible for the looting and destruction.)

Occupation of Peru

Chilean Army marching on Lima in 1881
Enlarge
Chilean Army marching on Lima in 1881

With little effective Peruvian central government remaining, Chile pursued a brutal campaign throughout Peru, especially on the coast and the central Sierra, penetrating as far north as Cajamarca. Remarkably, even in these circumstances, Chile was not able to completely subjugate Peru. As war booty, Chile confiscated the Peruvian National Library from Lima and transported thousands of books (including many original Spanish, Peruvian and Colonial volumes) to Santiago de Chile, along with much capital stock.

Peruvian resistance continued for three more years, with U.S. encouragement. The remnants of the Peruvian Army defeated the Chilean Army on several occasions, but after the Battle of Huamachuco, there was very little further resistance. Finally, on 20 October 1883, Peru and Chile signed the Treaty of Ancón, by which Tarapacá province was forcefully ceded to the latter.

Aftermath

Peace terms

Under the terms of the Treaty of Ancón, Chile was to occupy the provinces of Tacna and Arica for 10 years, after which a plebiscite was to be held to determine their nationality. But the two countries failed for decades to agree on the terms the plebiscite.

In 1884, a truce between Bolivia and Chile gave the latter control of the entire Bolivian coast, the province of Antofagasta, with valuable nitrate, copper and other mineral deposits. A treaty in 1904 made this arrangement permanent. In return Chile agreed to build a railroad connecting the Bolivian capital of La Paz with the port of Arica and guaranteed freedom of transit for Bolivian commerce through Chilean ports and territory. Finally in 1929, through the mediation of the United States under president Herbert Hoover, an accord was reached by which Chile kept Arica; Peru reacquired Tacna and received $6 million indemnity and other concessions.

Long term consequences

The War of the Pacific left traumatic scars on Bolivian and Peruvian society.

For Bolivians, the loss of the territory which they refer to as the litoral (Spanish for "littoral" - the coast) remains a deeply emotional issue and a practical one, as was particularly evident during the internal natural gas riots of 2004. Popular belief attributes much of the country's problems to its landlocked condition; conversely, recovering the seacoast is seen as the solution to most of these. In 1932, this was a contributing factor to the Chaco War with Paraguay, over territory controlling access to the Atlantic Ocean through the Paraguay River. In recent decades, all Bolivian Presidents have made it their policy to pressure Chile for a return of lost territory. Currently, leading Bolivian newspaper "El Diario" [4] still features at least a weekly editorial on the subject.

Peruvians developed a cult for the heroic defenders of the patria (nation, literally fatherland), such as Admiral Miguel Grau, Colonel Francisco Bolognesi who were killed in the war, and Andrés A. Cáceres who went on to become a leading political figure and symbol of resistance to the occupying Chilean Army. The defeat engendered a deep inferiority complex among the ruling classes, which also led to a skewed view of the role of the armed forces, which dominated society throughout the 20th century.

Chile fared better, gaining a lucrative territory with major sources of income, including nitrates, saltpeter and copper. Victory was, however, a mixed blessing. During the war Chile waived most of its claim over Patagonia in 1881 to ensure Argentina's neutrality; Chilean popular belief sees this as a territorial loss. British involvement and control of the nitrate industry rose significantly after the war[5], leading them to meddle in Chilean politics and ultimately to back an overthrow of the Chilean President in 1891. High nitrate profits lasted for only a few decades and fell sharply once synthetic nitrates were developed during World War I. Currently, the region is still a major source of copper and its ports move trade between nearby countries and the Pacific Ocean.

Characteristics of the War

Strategic control of the sea

The war theatre between 1879 and 1881 was a large expanse of desert, sparsely populated and far removed from major cities or resource centers; it is, however, close to the Pacific Ocean. It was clear from the beginning that control of the sea would be the key to an inevitably difficult desert war: supply by sea, including water, food, ammunition, horses, fodder and reinforcements, was quicker and easier than marching supplies through the desert or the Bolivian high plateau.

While the Chilean Navy started an economic and military blockade of the Allies' ports, Peru took the initiative and utilized its smaller but effective navy as a raiding force. Chile was forced to delay the ground invasion for six months, and to shift its its fleet from blockading to hunting Huáscar until she was captured.

With the advantage of naval supremacy, Chilean ground strategy focused on mobility: landing ground forces into enemy territory to raid Allied ground assets; landing in strength to split and drive out defenders; leaving garrisons to guard territory as the war moved north. Peru and Bolivia fought a defensive war: maneuvering along long overland distances; relying where possible on land or coastal fortifications with gun batteries and minefields; coastal railways were available to Peru, and telegraph lines provided a direct line to the government in Lima. When retreating, Allied forces made sure that little if any assets remained to be used by the enemy.

Sea mobile forces proved to be, in the end, an advantage for desert warfare on a long coastline. Defenders found themselves hundreds of kilometers away from home; invading forces were usually a few kilometers away from the sea.

Occupation, resistance and attrition

The occupation of Peru between 1881 and 1884 was a different story altogether. The war theatre was the Peruvian Sierra, where Peruvian resistance had easy access to population, resource and supply centers further away from the sea; it could carry out a war of attrition indefinitely. The Chilean Army, turned occupation force, was split into small garrisons across the theatre and could devote only part of its strength to hunting down rebels without a central authority.

After a costly occupation and prolonged anti-insurgency campaign, Chile sought to achieve a political exit strategy. Rifts within Peruvian society provided such an opportunity after the Battle of Huamachuco, and resulted in the peace treaty that ended the occupation and the war.

Technology

The war saw the use by both sides of new, or recently introduced military technology such as breech-loading rifles, remote-controlled land mines, armour-piercing shells, torpedoes, torpedo boats and purpose-built landing craft. Second-generation ironclads (i.e. designed after the Battle of Hampton Roads) were faced in battle for the first time.

This was significant for a conflict where a major power was not directly involved and drew the attention of British, French and U.S. observers.

Prominent military commanders

Bolivia

Chile

  • General Manuel Baquedano, commander in chief of the Chilean Army
  • Rear Admiral Patricio Lynch, military Governor of occupied Peru
  • Captain Arturo Prat †, was killed while boarding Huáscar at the Battle of Iquique

Peru

See also

References

  1. ^  Border treaty of 1866 between Bolivia and Chile (Tratado de límites de 1866 entre Bolivia y Chile, in Spanish)
  2. ^  Border treaty of 1874 between Bolivia and Chile (Tratado de límites de 1874 entre Bolivia y Chile, in Spanish)
  3. ^  Defensive alliance treaty of 1873 between Bolivia and Peru (Tratado de alianza defensiva de 1873 entre Bolivia y Perú, in Spanish)
  4. ^  Foster, John B. & Clark, Brett. (2003). "Ecological Imperialism: The Curse of Capitalism" (accessed September 2, 2005). The Socialist Register 2004, p190-192. Also available in print from Merlin Press.

External links

Personal tools