Dutch referendum on the European Constitution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

National referenda on the European Constitution
Czech Republic	Cancelled
Denmark	Postponed
France	No (55% of 69%)
Ireland	Date not set
Luxembourg	Yes (57% of 88%)
Netherlands	No (62% of 63%)
Poland	Postponed
Portugal	Postponed
Spain	Yes (77% of 42%)
United Kingdom	Postponed
Parliamentary approvals

On 1 June 2005 a consultative referendum was held in the Netherlands to ask whether the country should ratify the proposed Constitution of the European Union. The vote was the first national referendum in modern Dutch history, and was not binding on the government, meaning that despite the electorate rejecting the Constitution it could theoretically still be ratified by the Estates-General. The government has said, however, that it will abide by a decisive result, provided turnout exceeds 30 per cent. Official results say that 61.5 per cent of voters rejected the Constitution, on a turnout of 63.3 per cent.

The question put to voters was:

Bent U voor of tegen instemming door Nederland met het verdrag tot vaststelling van een grondwet voor Europa?

"Are you for or against approval by the Netherlands of the treaty establishing a constitution for Europe?"

The possible answers were voor (for), tegen (against), and it was possible to cast a blank ballot. The latter did not count for the result, but allowed voters to make an affirmative abstention.

The referendum came just three days after the French referendum on the Constitution resulted in its rejection. Because all EU member states need to ratify the treaty for it to take effect, some regarded the Dutch referendum as irrelevant. However, Dutch campaigners for a "Yes" vote appealed to the electorate to avoid damaging the Netherlands' standing in Europe in the way that the French result is perceived to have weakened the position of France. Many "No" campaigners expressed the view that French rejection of the treaty would encourage Dutch voters to follow suit. A second "No" vote in a referendum in one of the founding countries of the project of European integration is widely regarded as having the power to "kill off" the treaty. Opinion polls in the days leading up to the referendum gave the "No" campaign a clear lead.

1 Campaign
2 Results
3 Reasons for rejection
4 External links and references

[edit]

Campaign

The governing and major opposition parties, making up 80 per cent of the country's members of parliament, all backed the Constitution, along with the major newspapers. The parties of the coalition: the Christian Democratic Appeal, People's Party for Freedom and Democracy and Democrats 66, all campaigned for a "Yes" vote, as did the opposition Labour Party and Green Left. The Socialist Party, List Pim Fortuyn, Group Wilders, Political Reformed Party and Christian Union all campaigned for a "No" vote.

The result is notable, since the largest party to campaign a "No" was the Socialist Party, with 6 per cent of the votes during the last elections (although in the polls it is now the third largest party). The "Yes" campaign was supported by all major parties (most of which are currently at loss in the polls).

Opinion polls in the months before the vote tended to show the public split on the issue, with the "No" campaign taking a clear lead as the referendum approached; but as many as half of the electorate admitted to having little or no knowledge of the contents and provisions of the Constitution.

A popular Internet vote test called Referendumwijzer was launched on 21 April, but critics have argued that it is biased towards the Constitution, pointing out that even those most strongly against the treaty are receiving results in favour of it because of questions regarding democracy and the environment which are not necessarily relevant to the Constitution. Television broadcasts by the "Yes" campaign provoked controversy for raising the spectre of war and chaos in Europe if the Constitution was rejected. The most emotive of the adverts, which featured emotive images of the Holocaust and Srebrenica Massacre, were never aired by the "Yes" campaign, but received national news coverage and were received very poorly.

A TNS/NIPO poll on 19 May indicated that 38 per cent of people intended to vote, with 27 per cent in favour, and 54 per cent against the Constitution. A poll by the same organisation on 30 May—two days before the referendum—concluded that 58 per cent of those who intended to vote would reject the treaty. As the referendum approached, many "Yes" campaigners began to predict defeat, and some even expressed relief after the French rejection of the treaty, taking the view that this would prevent the Netherlands from being the first or only country to obstruct the course of ratification, even though they also expressed dismay that the French result had given the "No" campaign greater legitimacy and acceptance, and had suggested to the public that the Netherlands' standing in Europe would not be significantly damaged by a "No" vote, with some going as far as saying that the Netherlands would look like a fool in front of the rest of Europe.

[edit]

Results

Official results:
Votes cast	7.705.196	63.3%
Abstentions	4.467.544	36.7%
Electorate	12.172.740	100.0%
Of votes cast:
Votes expressing a view	7.646.415	99.24%
Blank or invalid votes	58781	0.76%
Total votes	7.705.196	100.0%
Of Yes and No votes:
In favour	2.940.730	38.5%
Against	4.705.685	61.5%
Total	7.646.415	100%

Source: kiesraad

[edit]

Reasons for rejection

According to a poll [1] by Maurice de Hond, 30 per cent of the Constitution's opponents used the referendum as an opportunity to demonstrate their dissatisfaction with the government, instead of confining their deliberations to the contents of the treaty that was put before them. At the time of the referendum, the Netherlands' centre-right coalition government, led by Jan Peter Balkenende, was suffering a period of unpopularity as it tried to push through cuts in public spending, and there was widespread disillusion with the country's political elite.

Some matters relating to the European Union that motivated the "No" vote were also not strictly connected to the provisions of the Constitution. The debate over the accession of Turkey to the European Union, as well as countries of Eastern Europe, led to fears of an increase in immigration, or an outsourcing of jobs to new member states. Furthermore, the Netherlands had not held a referendum on the euro, and amidst concern that its adoption had led to an increase in the cost of living (combined with Dutch citizens' status as the largest net per capita contributors to the EU), around 30 per cent of the voters took the opportunity to "take revenge" on the political establishment for seeking to advance European integration in a manner that did not engage the public to the extent that it could have done.

A larger group of voters, however, voted "No" for reasons that were connected to the Constitution itself. 48 per cent thought the new Constitution was worse than the existing treaties, and 44 per cent cited the declining influence of the Netherlands in the EU, with the treaty as an important motivation. Linked to this was a fear of being dominated by the powerhouses of the European Union (particularly the United Kingdom, France and Germany). The perception of an aggressive and ruthless style on the part of the "Yes" campaign also put off many. The Minister of Justice, Piet Hein Donner, warned that a rejection would raise the chances of war and stated that "the C in CDA implies that you vote in favour of the constitution." The Minister for Economic Affairs, Laurens Jan Brinkhorst, said that "the lights would go off" in the case of a rejection and that The Netherlands would become "the Switzerland of Europe." The People's Party for Freedom and Democracy withdrew a controversial television broadcast, in which rejection was connected with the Holocaust, the genocide in Srebrenica and the terrorist attacks on March 11, 2004 in Madrid. This did the "Yes" campaign serious damage.